Category Archives: politics

Instant Message from I.M. #10

So for my international readers: the U.S. Presidential Election is done. Obama has won again, and I’m glad. Believe me. Romney was going to be the worst thing ever.

As some of you may remember, I work at a country club here in Georgia, and lemme tell you, the mood here for the Romney supporters is quite subdued. Now, I’m not gloating or anything, but there was one moment I found particularly amusing.

You see, I asked my supervisor what event we are working today, and he mumbled, “Some luncheon, fundraiser…thing.”

Poor guy.  You know its bad when the management is apathetic. XD

Posted from WordPress for Android

Advertisement
Tagged , ,

Modifying Society: Freedom a current reality?

This is a post about some documentaries I watched, which I use to support a somewhat dark but sincere view point I have about today’s society. While my arrival to my final statement is circuitous, I just wanted to lay this out first and foremost for those of you wondering why the next few paragraphs is me talking about…well…me.

Thanks English 1A.

Anyway…so recently I’ve had an alkaline desire to view the graphic and the real. In the past, I was never much of a gore hound, and I realize that this term has negative connotations, but it would seem this fact is changing.

To be frank, I can watch videos of Mexican cartels beheading people slowly and ineffectively with a kitchen knife and still have my dinner, do my homework, and go to sleep without any nightmares. Perhaps the only real effect such a terrible thing has on me now, is a darker view of the world, and a deeper skepticism as to whether or not “freedom” is a current reality anywhere, even here in America.

Extreme to say? Maybe. But just to be clear, I’m an idealist, not a nihilist. I see wrongdoings, and I find myself hard pressed to keep my mouth shut. I’m blunt, forward, and often times, tactless. Many people in my life have found this to be both an exemplary but troublesome quality in me.

Some small examples of what I mean: My husband once had to (literally) hold me back from jumping down the throat of some jerk who cut in front of us at a Las Vegas hotel. It was late, we were tired, and literally the next in line when this guy just slides right in front of us and starts barking at the hotel clerk. The clerk very tactfully handled the situation and we were checked in just fine. Another time, I was about to settle down for a LARP game (White Wolf’s, Changeling: The Lost) when the Storyteller decided a player was banned simply because the guy had once banged his girlfriend (who had dumped said dude and left him for the Storyteller). In a ridiculous fit, this 6 foot giant locked himself in his room and refused to come out, having this girl come out to deliver the news to my beleaguered friend. Stunned and annoyed, the guy was gonna leave to go hang out with his friends on the other side of the apartment building, and after hearing what went down, I flat out quit the game, telling the girl she could tell her boyfriend to stuff it.

This is me. This is how I am. If I weren’t married and considerate of my husband’s feelings, I probably would have run off to join the Occupy movement. A good thing, I feel now, in the long run. The occupiers stirred my heart with their passion, but they were a part of what I now recognize as an impressively ineffective way to bring about change in organized society. Maybe if I had been given some more guidance when I was younger, I would’ve gone to CSU: Longbeach when they first accepted me, and got into whatever crazy left wing groups they had there. But I didn’t, and here I am: A quiet little rebel with radical thoughts somehow married to a middle-line conservative Air Force soldier in the bible belt, serving bloody-marys and mimosas at a conservative country club.

Say what?

But that’s life! And maybe this introspection has been the reason I’ve been watching documentaries as of late. Two documentaries, seemingly irrelevant, really underscored the thought I stated above.

Is freedom a current reality in our world?

That said, if there is no freedom, is our oppression under societal rule all that bad? America, as my prime example since I friggin’ live here, offers many people many opportunities…

…But in order to have those opportunities, you have to be born in certain areas, and you canNOT break the acceptable mold of appearance and behavior that American society dictates.

My first case for this is the documentary, MODIFY:

This incredible film explores the world of body modification—and not just tattoos and piercings. It covers everything from body builders, to permanent make-up, to 3D body art, to dental reconstruction, to plastic surgery. It talks about the beginnings of the extreme piercing and 3D body art world. Returning to the rabbit hole everyone is familiar with, and going beyond conventional piercings and tattoos, there are also genital piercings, subdermal implants, tongue splitting, amputations, scarification, branding, and probably much more I’m missing.

The documentary is rather graphic in that it depicts surgical procedures, such as sex changes and plastic surgeries, and genital piercing procedures. It talks about the hows, the whys, and the plain ‘ol facts of body modification, and how it is the participants ultimate form of self-expression.

But these people, especially those who engage in the most extreme and exotic forms of body modification, are often shunned by society for their choice in appearance. Many people who seek body modifications are actually rather religious. One man even stated that he was a born again Christian, but had been called the Devil numerous times.

The documentary also talks about the legal gray areas of body modification, and how currently there are hundreds of bills being sent through the political machine to try and restrict certain forms of body modification. The speakers on the documentary all voiced their adamant opposition to this, stating together in summary, “It is my body, and I have a right to change it to what I want.” As one self-described narcissistic, and nihilistic body modder stated, freedom is an illusion, everything is an illusion.

But given that I can’t get a job outside of this subculture with face tattoos and horn implants, I have to wonder if that guy was at least partially correct. What does it matter that I have tattoos up and down my arms? If I am capable to do the job required of me, I should be allowed to work, is my view. But is this the case? No. I realize that body modification is associated with the underworld of criminal activity, but this is an unwholesome misconception. Many of these people have families, but when they try to go down the street with their kids, people stare at them like they have robbed someone else’s crib. It’s a shame.

I have “body mods” too. I’ve got copper highlights in my hair, piercings in my ears, piercings in my nipples, and a tattoo of X-Men’s Storm on my left upper arm. Whether or not you consider these extreme or not, these are indeed modifications to my body, and you have to ask yourself: why are some forms of body modification more acceptable to others? We all say, “Don’t judge a book by it’s cover.” Frankly? I think we should shut up about books and start talking about real people. Because that’s who these body modders are. People.

The next documentary that I watched was Crips and Bloods: Made In America.

This documentary provides an interesting look into Los Angeles, California’s two notorious rival gangs, and the turbulent history of oppression and injustice that very likely led to their creation. It’s directed by Stacy Peralta, the filmmaker responsible for Dogtown & Z Boys, one of my favorite documentaries, and narrated by Forest Whitaker. The story begins in the 1950’s when many African American “clubs” were formed by adolescent teenagers. To name a few, there were the “Slausons”, active from 1952-1965, the “Businessmen”, active from 1957-1965, and the “Gladiators”, active from 1952-1965.

A Few Slausons’ Club Members

Commentary was provided from three former Slausons’ members, who stated their thoughts as to how these clubs came to formation, and what they really were about. In the 1950s, there weren’t “outreach programs” or “community groups” unified to encourage black youth and keep them out of trouble. One speaker even stated that the Boy Scouts turned him and his mother away because the troop leader believed some of the parents, “would feel uncomfortable.” Coupled with the constant harassment the black community faced at large in LA at the time, these things caused some youths to try to band together in an effort to create safety and pride. For them, it wasn’t about drugs and killing each other. Was there violence? Yes, to some degree. But guns and knives were never involved. Disputes were always handled by their fists. Club members were “notorious” for being difficult with white law enforcement, and often beat each other up for crossing imaginary territory lines. But there were no murders. No “beefs”. In fact, these clubs all united in 1965 for what was called, “The Watts Rebellion.”

It was a bloody and violent conflict, and it showed the pent up frustration that the southern LA African American community felt towards their being forced into poor living conditions, and the attacks faced by law enforcement. Many club members went on to become Black Panthers. Many became influential leaders in their communities for black pride. This new African American movement alarmed white government officials, who saw this as a threat to national security. The FBI and LAPD were known to consider these groups as dangerous and unlawful.

During this period, many black leaders were either imprisoned or assassinated.

By the end of the 70s, black youth were suddenly bereft of a righteous cause, and yet still denied equal opportunity. They were left angry, disenfranchised, and poor. They grew up, witnessing the organized and passionate movements their parents had participated in without an outlet of their own. Peralta suggests this led to the creation of today’s gangs.

Bloods

Crips — Allegedly created before the Bloods, they are assumed to have been founded by Raymond Lee Washington, who was murdered in 1979 at a young age.

The documentary loses some points with me, despite their interesting foundation of information, for neglecting to detail just how the Crips and Bloods arose from all of this, and for failing to answer who their founders were, and what their lives had been like. While it is true that these gang founders were killed at a young age and thus, we shall never know what their original intent had been beyond basic survival (maybe that’s all there ever was?), I still feel like Peralta lacked a direct connection with LA’s African American history, and today’s current gang violence. After all, it has been stated that Raymond Lee Washington, the original founder of the Crips, disliked guns and knives. His crimes were often attempts to protect himself or provide for basic needs—such as robberies consisting largely of food and clothing. But by the time of his death, he had little to no control of the Crips, and there is no current understanding as to why he was murdered in the first place. Maybe there wasn’t a reason, as can be the case in gang violence. But regardless, I think Peralta could have at least mentioned some of this in the documentary.

Still, the film does an excellent job giving a glimpse into today’s Crips and Bloods, offering testimonies from current members and former members alike, as well as the families of some of their victims. The basic point that the film makes is this: the Crips and the Bloods are a product of the America that was, and the America that is. Many African American men are incarcerated, tearing apart families over non-violent offenses. Criminal records often bar released prisoners from starting a new and lawful life, resulting in frustration and a return to crime. Sub-standard living and “gang task forces” also lend to the vicious cycle. After all, with discrimination and violence, and without equal opportunity, how can one expect the birthplace of these gangs to end their illicit activities?

What I especially liked was that the film doesn’t just leave you with this bloody and sad mess of societal failure, and it especially doesn’t give you any room to think that Peralta is somehow glorifying gangbanging—the film ends on a bittersweet, but otherwise positive note that, despite the continuing existence of these gangs, there are some who are willing to risk their lives, without government assistance, to try to turn the tide. This brave lot includes former gangbangers who try to reach out to young people and tell them how it really is.

So in America, where you can’t look a certain way, be born in a certain place, or even be related to certain people…does the concept of freedom still ring true in your ears?

For me, it rings more as a possibility. This may sound cheesy, and even pretentious, but if we don’t save our children from the unjust prejudices and social failures of the present, all of our bullshit will sound just like that…

Bullshit.

Tagged , , , , , ,

My Fellow Americans: This Is Where I Stand

I am voting for Obama.

There.

I said it. (Though my choice was obvious I thought, from the get go.) After watching the DNC speeches and catching up on the news, I just can’t stay quiet about this. I didn’t want to make anyone feel attacked for their beliefs, so this is a general message to everyone. If you don’t want to muck around with politics? That’s fine, don’t read this. Sorry for wasting your time. But if you care about this stuff as much as I do? Hear me out. But understand, I’m a liberal and I feel very strongly about all of this, so some of my wording may not be as diplomatic as you might want it to be.

Romney is an idiot who will just further the agendas that got this country in trouble to begin with. He is a puppet who has no views of his own, and the extreme right have their hands firmly shoved up his ass to get him to do whatever silly nonsense they want him to do.

Did Romney want to save the auto industry? NO:

Does he care about the working class poor? NO:

Does he flip flop on everything? YES:

Does he like firing people? Apparently? …YES:

It may not be conclusive that Romney was involved in Bain Capital’s lay-offs and outsourcing jobs, but his being “retired” from Bain in 1999 is questionable enough to make one wonder, “Why is a guy who is for making jobs and improving the economy associated with a company that is the antithesis of that?”

http://www.newsday.com/elections/mitt-romney-no-apologies-but-victims-comment-not-elegantly-stated-1.4012121?qr=1

Apparently we’re all just a bunch of whiners to him. As Bill Clinton so excellently stated in his speech at the DNC, the Republicans have only one thing to say to the middle class and the poor, “You’re on your own.” But in my honest opinion? Further equal opportunity and fostering a mentality of “We’re all in this together,” is far better than screwing people over to make the rich even comfier than they are.

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2012/06/four-things-romney-wishes-he-hadnt-said-about-romneycare/54058/

Once upon a time in Massachusetts, Romney had these health care ideas that some people disagreed with. He went through with it, and even boasted that it was a good national model for health care. Obama took him up on that offer. Now? Suddenly Obama care is terrible! This health care plan our president based off of ROMNEY’S LEGISLATION, which gives healthcare to those who wouldn’t have received it otherwise, and allows senior citizens to afford their medication is suddenly bad.

Romney and his running mate, Paul Ryan, want to attack women’s health care:

http://www.plannedparenthoodaction.org/elections-politics/womens-health-budget-1154.htm

The reaction from women was powerful. Romney saw he could possibly lose the election because of this. So what does he do? HE FLIP FLOPS AGAIN:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/aug/28/mitt-romney-flipflops-healthcare-woo-back-women1

And you students out there like me? Romney is AGAINST increasing funds for pell grants. His belief is that two-year degrees are more beneficial than four-year degrees. America is the 16TH country in the world for students with bachelor degrees. WHAT!? And this sucker wants to basically make it harder for students to pay off their loans, let alone get approved for one? Apparently, the issue isn’t that we need to create more accessibility to college, but we need to improve college retention. Romney….dude….you know that most people drop out because they CAN’T PAY FOR SCHOOL right?http://www.usnews.com/education/blogs/student-loan-ranger/2012/06/06/what-romneys-education-plan-means-for-college-students

Look…whatever you guys may think, Romney is NOT the answer for our nation. He has no firm positions of his own, and his backwards thinking will just land us in hot water. Nevermind that Paul Ryan is a Tea Party monstrosity that will hang civil liberties for the vultures to peck at.

Barack Obama is not perfect. That is not the argument I’m making here. What I’m trying to say is that Romney and Ryan are NOT THE ANSWER. 4 years is not enough to fix an economy as damaged as Obama found it, and you know what? If you’re mad about the bailouts, I’d just like to note that Bush had started those BEFORE Obama even got into office. So let’s not go there. Living down here in Georgia, I get sick to my stomach hearing from people shitting on Obama’s health care, and how he’s not a real Christian, and how he scammed his way into college, how he’s a socialist, and his birth certificate is fake, etc…..

Wake up and smell the coffee, people. You want Romney in office? Then your values are in the wrong place, and I’m prepared to argue my point with anyone who responds to this post.

Tagged , ,